December 11, 2010
December 10, 2010
Back and Forth
December 7, 2010
Rehab (no, no, no)
November 28, 2010
18 Days in Hospital
November 19, 2010
Recovery: Two Days In
Adam is doing well. Of course, brain surgery is a Big Deal, and one doesn’t bounce out of bed the next morning. He’s feeling pretty crummy, but he’s recovering.
He seems a little more aware this morning (asking for his stuffed doggy), but he slept turned to his right last night (I was sleeping next to him) and fluid puffed up the right side of his face. Again, looks ugly but apparently not very concerning to the staff here.November 17, 2010
After Adam’s Surgery
November 16, 2010
An Update on Adam
November 13, 2010
Adam's Tumor
December 18, 2009
Help for Ethiopian orphans
We adopted a son, Adam Abera, from Ethiopia this year. He's a gift and a delight, and our good fortune in adding him to our family is far greater than his good fortune in being added to ours. However, it is true that we brought him home to material support, comfort, security, and opportunity far greater than what he left behind, and of Ethiopia's five million orphans, only a tiny fraction can or should be supported by adoption into first-world nations.
While we were there, we met the remarkable Dr. Tsegaye Berhe, the director of Wide Horizons for Children's program in Ethiopia—a man who truly loves and strives on behalf of children. He impressed upon us how deep the need there is and told us of their program to offer support to the vast number of children there for whom the proper path is not adoption—orphaned children who have family to care for them in Ethiopia, but who need support.
WHFC's program not only provides basic material support for the children you sponsor, it also makes an investment so their families can found viable, profitable businesses, and so, enable them to progress towards self-sufficiency. You can read more about the program here, including a brochure and FAQ.
This season, I would like to ask you to make a commitment and contribution to sponsor a child. $420/year can pull not only a single child, but a family out of poverty. Right now, go to WHFC's Child Sponsorship site and sign up. $420/year is $1.15 per day.
After you've contributed, please let me know. I've made a commitment that I and my companions in group 79, who brought home a double handful of kids this summer, will sponsor 79 children, and I'd like for your support to count towards that goal.
Thank you!
Tim, Laura, Adam, Lucile and Henry.
July 9, 2008
Missing the point
Benjamin Black has a service called the tls report that grades web sites based on the quality of their SSL configuration: points are taken off for SSL 2 support, support for shorter keys, etc. While I respect the effort and I value the concern for better security, this is just silly. Extending cryptographic key length is the least valuable thing any site can do to improve the security of people's data. Gene Spafford got it right when he said:
Using encryption on the Internet is the equivalent of arranging an armored car to deliver credit card information from someone living in a cardboard box to someone living on a park bench.Worrying about whether the keys are 40-bit, 56-bit, 128-bit, or larger is the equivalent of worrying about whether the armored car guards are carrying revolvers or machine guns: it entirely misses the point. I'm not aware of a single case, ever, where an attacker stole data from a commercial site by cracking an SSL key of any length. Note also that SSL/TLS has mechanisms to prevent an attacker from forcing you to negotiate a lower grade of security than you ask for, so if you turn off 40 bit ciphers in your browser, an attacker cannot force a downgrade (other than by cracking the server's private key), so a site that supports 40-bit keys does you no harm at all. As such, in addition to measuring something not particularly relevant to security, these grades are irrelevant to the security of users paranoid and well-informed enough to know about them and care. If you're concerned about the security of your data, you should be concerned with how a site handles your account password and your data at rest. Of course, this is harder to observe than SSL settings, so Mr. Black appears to fall into a trap that catches a lot of the security community: thinking about problems that are easier to see and measure, even if they're not the truly significant security problems.



